Systems and methods to determine media effectiveness

ABSTRACT

Example systems, methods and machine readable media are disclosed. An example system includes a synchronizer to determine a total amount to offset first-neuro-response data gathered from a subject exposed to media to align the first neuro-response data with second neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the subject. The first neuro-response data is associated with a first sensory component of the media and the second neuro-response data is associated with a second sensory component of the media. The total amount to offset is based on a first cognitive delay associated with the first neuro-response data and a second cognitive delay associated with the second neuro-response data. The synchronizer is to time shift at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response based on the total amount to form aligned data. The example system includes an analyzer to determine an effectiveness of the media based on the aligned data.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent arises from a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/659,592, filed on Oct. 24, 2012, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,751, filed on Oct. 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,327,395, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,752, filed on Oct. 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,332,883, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/977,035, filed Oct. 2, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/977,040, filed Oct. 2, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/977,042, filed Oct. 2, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/977,045, filed Oct. 2, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/984,260, filed Oct. 31, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/984,268, filed Oct. 31, 2007.

This patent claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/991,591, filed Nov. 30, 2007.

This patent is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/681,265, filed Mar. 2, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/804,517, filed May 17, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/779,814, filed Jul. 18, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/846,068, filed Aug. 28, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/959,399, filed Dec. 18, 2007; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,737, filed Oct. 2, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,748, filed Oct. 2, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,331, filed Oct. 31, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,350, filed Oct. 31, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/326,016, filed Dec. 1, 2008; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/252,910, filed Oct. 4, 2011.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to the field of analysis of physiological responses from viewers of media instances.

BACKGROUND

A key to creating a high performing media instance is to ensure that every event in the media elicits the desired responses from viewers. Here, the media instance can be but is not limited to, a video game, an advertisement clip, a movie, a computer application, a printed media (e.g., a magazine), a website, an online advertisement, a recorded video, a live performance of media, and other types of media.

Physiological data, which includes but is not limited to heart rate, brain waves, electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, blink rate, breathing, motion, muscle movement, galvanic skin response and any other response correlated with changes in emotion of a viewer of a media instance, can give a trace (e.g., a line drawn by a recording instrument) of the viewer's responses while he/she is watching the media instance. The physiological data can be measure by one or more physiological sensors, each of which can be but is not limited to, an electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, an accelerometer, a blood oxygen sensor, a galvanometer, an electromyograph, skin temperature sensor, breathing sensor, eye tracking, pupil dilation sensing, and any other physiological sensor.

It is well established that physiological data in the human body of a viewer correlates with the viewer's change in emotions. Thus, from the measured “low level” physiological data, “high level” (e.g., easier to understand, intuitive to look at) physiological responses from the viewers of the media instance can be created. An effective media instance that connects with its audience/viewers is able to elicit the desired emotional response. Here, the high level physiological responses include, but are not limited to, liking (valence)—positive/negative responses to events in the media instance, intent to purchase or recall, emotional engagement in the media instance, thinking—amount of thoughts and/or immersion in the experience of the media instance, and adrenaline—anger, distraction, frustration, and other emotional experiences to events in the media instance, and tension and stress.

Advertisers, media producers, educators, scientists, engineers, doctors and other relevant parties have long desired to have greater access to collected reactions to their media products and records of responses through a day from their targets, customers, clients and pupils. These parties desire to understand the responses people have to their particular stimulus in order to tailor their information or media instances to better suit the needs of end users and/or to increase the effectiveness of the media instance created. Making the reactions to the media instances available remotely over the Web to these interested parties has potentially very large commercial and socially positive impacts. Consequently, allowing a user to remotely access and analyze the media instance and the physiological responses from numerous viewers to the media instance is desired.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Each patent, patent application, and/or publication mentioned in this specification is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety to the same extent as if each individual patent, patent application, and/or publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Notwithstanding the prior sentence, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,737, filed Oct. 2, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,748, filed Oct. 2, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,331, filed Oct. 31, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/244,752, filed Oct. 2, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,350, filed Oct. 31, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/326,016, filed Dec. 1, 2008; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/252,910, filed Oct. 4, 2011 are not incorporated by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support remote access and analysis of media and reactions from viewers.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support remote access and analysis of media and reactions from viewers.

FIG. 3 shows one or more exemplary physiological responses aggregated from the viewers and presented in the response panel of the interactive browser.

FIG. 4 shows exemplary verbatim comments and feedbacks collected from the viewers and presented in the response panel of the interactive browser.

FIG. 5 shows exemplary answers to one or more survey questions collected from the viewers and presented as a pie chart in the response panel of the interactive browser.

FIG. 6 shows exemplary answers to one or more survey questions collected from the viewers and presented as a histogram

FIG. 7 shows an exemplary graph displaying the percentages of viewers who “liked” or “really liked” a set of advertisements.

FIG. 8 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support providing actionable insights based on in-depth analysis of reactions from viewers.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support providing actionable insights based on in-depth analysis of reactions from viewers.

FIG. 10 shows exemplary highlights and arrows representing trends in the physiological responses from the viewers as well as verbal explanation of such markings.

FIG. 11 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support synchronization of media with physiological responses from viewers.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support synchronization of media with physiological responses from viewers.

FIG. 13 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support graphical presentation of verbatim comments from viewers.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support graphical presentation of verbatim comments from viewers.

FIG. 15 shows an exemplary bubble graph presenting summation of positive and negative comments from the viewers to various aspects of the media instance.

FIG. 16 shows an exemplary word cloud presenting key words and concepts from the viewers of the media instance.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Examples disclosed herein enable remote and interactive access, navigation, and analysis of reactions from one or more viewers to a specific media instance. Here, the reactions include, but are not limited to, physiological responses, survey results, verbatim feedback, event-based metadata, and derived statistics for indicators of success and failure from the viewers. The reactions from the viewers are aggregated and stored in a database and are delivered to a user via a web-based graphical interface or application, such as a Web browser. Through the web-based graphical interface, the user is able to remotely access and navigate the specific media instance, together with one or more of: the aggregated physiological responses that have been synchronized with the media instance, the survey results, and the verbatim feedbacks related to the specific media instance. Instead of being presented with static data (such as a snapshot) of the viewers' reactions to the media instance, the user is now able to interactively divide, dissect, parse, and analysis the reactions in any way he/she prefer. The examples disclosed herein provide automation that enables those who are not experts in the field of physiological analysis to understand and use physiological data by enabling these non-experts to organize the data and organize and improve presentation or visualization of the data according to their specific needs. In this manner, the examples disclosed herein provide an automated process that enables non-experts to understand complex data, and to organize the complex data in such a way as to present conclusions as appropriate to the media instance.

In the following description, numerous specific details are introduced to provide a thorough understanding of, and enabling description for, example systems and methods. One skilled in the relevant art, however, will recognize that these examples can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other components, systems, etc. In other instances, well-known structures or operations are not shown, or are not described in detail, to avoid obscuring aspects of the disclosed examples.

Having multiple reactions from the viewers (e.g., physiological responses, survey results, verbatim feedback, events tagged with metadata, etc.) available in one place and at a user's fingertips, along with the automated methods for aggregating the data provided herein, allows the user to view the reactions to hundreds of media instances in one sitting by navigating through them. For each of the media instances, the integration of multiple reactions provides the user with more information than the sum of each of the reactions to the media instance. For a non-limiting example, if one survey says that an ad is bad, that is just information; but if independent surveys, verbatim feedbacks and physiological data across multiple viewers say the same, the reactions to the media instance become more trustworthy. By combining this before a user sees it, the correct result is presented to the user.

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example system to support automated remote access and analysis of media and reactions from viewers. Although this diagram depicts components as functionally separate, such depiction is merely for illustrative purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the components portrayed in this figure can be arbitrarily combined or divided into separate software, firmware and/or hardware components. Furthermore, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that such components, regardless of how they are combined or divided, can execute on the same computing device or multiple computing devices, and wherein the multiple computing devices can be connected by one or more networks.

Referring to FIG. 1, an authentication module 102 is operable to authenticate identity of a user 101 requesting access to a media instance 103 together with one or more reactions 104 from a plurality of viewers of the media instance remotely over a network 107. Here, the media instance and its pertinent data can be stored in a media database 105, and the one or more reactions from the viewers can be stored in a reaction database 106, respectively. The network 107 can be, but is not limited to, one or more of the internet, intranet, wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), wireless network, Bluetooth, and mobile communication networks. Once the user is authenticated, a presentation module 108 is operable to retrieve and present the requested information (e.g., the media instance together with one or more reactions from the plurality of viewers) to the user via an interactive browser 109. The interactive browser 109 comprises at least two panels including a media panel 110, which is operable to present, play, and pause the media instance, and a response panel 111, which is operable to display the one or more reactions corresponding to the media instance, and provide the user with a plurality of features to interactively divide, dissect, parse, and analyze the reactions.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support remote access and analysis of media and reactions from viewers. Although this figure depicts functional steps in a particular order for purposes of illustration, the process is not limited to any particular order or arrangement of steps. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the various steps portrayed in this figure could be omitted, rearranged, combined and/or adapted in various ways.

Referring to FIG. 2, a media instance and one or more reactions to the instance from a plurality of viewers are stored and managed in one or more databases at step 201. Data or information of the reactions to the media instance is obtained or gathered from each user via a sensor headset, one example of which is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/206,676, filed Sep. 8, 2008, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/804,517, filed May 17, 2007, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/681,265, filed Mar. 2, 2007. At step 202, the identity of a user requesting access to the media instance and the one or more reactions remotely is authenticated. At step 203, the requested media instance and the one or more reactions are retrieved and delivered to the user remotely over a network (e.g., the Web). At step 204, the user may interactively aggregate, divide, dissect, parse, and analyze the one or more reactions to draw conclusions about the media instance.

In some examples, alternative forms of access to the one or more reactions from the viewers other than over the network may be adopted. For non-limiting examples, the reactions can be made available to the user on a local server on a computer or on a recordable media such as a DVD disc with all the information on the media.

In some examples, with reference to FIG. 1, an optional analysis module 112 is operable to perform in-depth analysis on the viewers' reactions to a media instance as well as the media instance itself (e.g., dissecting the media instance into multiple scenes/events/sections). Such analysis provides the user with information on how the media instance created by the user is perceived by the viewers. In addition, the analysis module is also operable to categorize viewers' reactions into the plurality of categories.

In some examples, user database 113 stores information of users who are allowed to access the media instances and the reactions from the viewers, and the specific media instances and the reactions each user is allowed to access. The access module 106 may add or remove a user for access, and limit or expand the list of media instances and/or reactions the user can access and/or the analysis features the user can use by checking the user's login name and password. Such authorization/limitation on a user's access can be determined based upon who the user is, e.g., different amounts of information for different types of users. For a non-limiting example, Company ABC can have access to certain ads and survey results of viewers' reactions to the ads, which Company XYZ cannot or have only limited access to.

In some examples, one or more physiological responses aggregated from the viewers can be presented in the response panel 111 as lines or traces 301 in a two-dimensional graph or plot as shown in FIG. 3. Horizontal axis 302 of the graph represents time, and vertical axis 303 of the graph represents the amplitude (intensity) of the one or more physiological responses. Here, the one or more physiological responses are aggregated over the viewers via one or more of: max, min, average, deviation, or a higher ordered approximation of the intensity of the physiological responses from the viewers. The responses are synchronized with the media instance at each and every moment over the entire duration of the media instance, allowing the user to identify the second-by second changes in viewers' emotions and their causes. A cutting line 304 marks the physiological responses from the viewers corresponding to the current scene (event, section, or moment in time) of the media instance. The cutting line moves in coordination with the media instance being played.

In some examples, change (trend) in amplitude of the aggregated responses is also a good measure of the quality of the media instance. If the media instance is able to change viewers emotions up and down in a strong manner (for a non-limiting example, mathematical deviation of the response is large), such strong change in amplitude corresponds to a good media instance that puts the viewers into different emotional states. In contrast, a poor performing media instance does not put the viewers into different emotional states. The amplitudes and the trend of the amplitudes of the responses are good measures of the quality of the media instance. Such information can be used by media designers to identify if the media instance is eliciting the desired response and which key events/scenes/sections of the media instance need to be changed in order to match the desired response. A good media instance should contain multiple moments/scenes/events that are intense and produce positive amplitude of response across viewers. A media instance that failed to create such responses may not achieve what the creators of the media instance have intended.

In some examples, other than providing a second by second view for the user to see how specific events in the media instance affect the viewers' emotions, the aggregated responses collected and calculated can also be used for the compilation of aggregate statistics, which are useful in ranking the overall affect of the media instance. Such statistics include but are not limited to Average Liking and Heart Rate Deviation.

In some examples, the viewers of the media instance are free to write comments (e.g., what they like, what they dislike, etc.) on the media instance, and the verbatim (free flowing text) comments or feedbacks 401 from the viewers can be recorded and presented in a response panel 111 as shown in FIG. 4. Such comments can be prompted, collected, and recorded from the viewers while they are watching the specific media instance and the most informative ones are put together and presented to the user. The user may then analyze, and digest keywords in the comments to obtain a more complete picture of the viewers' reactions. In addition, the user can search for specific keywords he/she is interested in about the media instance, and view only those comments containing the specified keywords.

In some examples, the viewers' comments about the media instance can be characterized as positive or negative in a plurality of categories/topics/aspects related to the product, wherein such categories include but are not limited to, product, event, logo, song, spokesperson, jokes, narrative, key events, storyline. These categories may not be predetermined, but instead be extracted from the analysis of their comments.

In some examples, answers to one or more survey questions 501 aggregated from the viewers can be rendered graphically, for example, by being presented in the response panel 111 in a graphical format 502 as shown in FIG. 5 Alternatively, FIG. 6 is an exemplary histogram displaying the response distribution of viewers asked to rate an advertisement on a scale of 1-5. Here, the graphical format can be but is not limited to, a bar graph, a pie chart (e.g., as shown in FIG. 5), a histogram (e.g., as shown in FIG. 6), or any other suitable graph type.

In some examples, the survey questions can be posed or presented to the viewers while they are watching the specific media instance and their answers to the questions are collected, recorded, summed up by pre-defined categories via a surveying module 114. Once the survey results are made available to the user (creator of the media instance), the user may pick any of the questions, and be automatically presented with survey results corresponding to the question visually to the user. The user may then view and analyze how viewers respond to specific questions to obtain a more complete picture of the viewers' reactions.

In some examples, many different facets of the one or more reactions from the viewers described above can be blended into a few simple metrics that the user can use to see how it is currently positioned against the rest of their industry. For the user, knowing where it ranks in its industry in comparison to its competition is often the first step in getting to where it wants to be. For a non-limiting example, in addition to the individual survey results of a specific media instance, the surveying module may also provide the user with a comparison of survey results and statistics to multiple media instances. This automation allows the user not only to see the feedback that the viewers provided with respect to the specific media instance, but also to evaluate how the specific media instance compares to other media instances designed by the same user or its competitors. FIG. 7 shows an exemplary graph displaying the percentages of viewers who “liked” or “really liked” a set of advertisements, which helps to determine if a new ad is in the top quartile with respect to other ads.

Some examples disclosed herein provide a user not only with tools for accessing and obtaining a maximum amount of information out of reactions from a plurality of viewers to a specific media instance, but also with actionable insights on what changes the user can make to improve the media instance based on in-depth analysis of the viewers' reactions. Such analysis requires expert knowledge on the viewers' physiological behavior and large amounts of analysis time, which the user may not possess. Here, the reactions include but are not limited to, physiological responses, survey results, and verbatim feedbacks from the viewers, to name a few. The reactions from the viewers are aggregated and stored in a database and presented to the user via a graphical interface, as described above. In some examples, predefined methods for extracting information from the reactions and presenting that information are provided so that the user is not required to be an expert in physiological data analysis to reach and understand conclusions supported by the information. Making in-depth analysis of reactions to media instances and actionable insights available to a user enables a user who is not an expert in analyzing physiological data to obtain critical information that can have significant commercial and socially positive impacts.

FIG. 8 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support providing actionable insights based on in-depth analysis of reactions from viewers. Although this diagram depicts components as functionally separate, such depiction is merely for illustrative purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the components portrayed in this figure can be arbitrarily combined or divided into separate software, firmware and/or hardware components. Furthermore, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that such components, regardless of how they are combined or divided, can execute on the same computing device or multiple computing devices, and wherein the multiple computing devices can be connected by one or more networks.

Referring to FIG. 8, a collection module 803 is operable to collect, record, store and manage one or more reactions 802 from a plurality of viewers of a media instance 801. The viewers from whom reactions 802 are collected can be in the same physical location or different physical locations. Additionally, the viewers can be viewing the media instance and the reactions collected at the same time, or at different times (e.g., viewer 1 is viewing the media instance at 9 AM while viewer 2 is viewing the media instance at 3 PM). Data or information of the reactions to the media instance is obtained or gathered from each user via a sensor headset. In some examples, the sensor headset integrates sensors into a housing which can be placed on a human head for measurement of physiological data. The device includes at least one sensor and can include a reference electrode connected to the housing. A processor coupled to the sensor and the reference electrode receives signals that represent electrical activity in tissue of a user. The processor generates an output signal including data of a difference between an energy level in each of a first and second frequency band of the signals. The difference between energy levels is proportional to release level present time emotional state of the user. The headset includes a wireless transmitter that transmits the output signal to a remote device. The headset therefore processes the physiological data to create the output signal that correspond to a person's mental and emotional state (reactions or reaction data). An example of a sensor headset is described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/206,676, filed Sep. 8, 2008, 11/804,517, filed May 17, 2007, and 11/681,265, filed Mar. 2, 2007.

The media instance and its pertinent data can be stored in a media database 804, and the one or more reactions from the viewers can be stored in a reaction database 805, respectively. An analysis module 806 performs in-depth analysis on the viewers' reactions and provides actionable insights on the viewers' reactions to a user 807 so that the user can draw its own conclusion on how the media instance can/should be improved. A presentation module 808 is operable to retrieve and present the media instance 801 together with the one or more reactions 802 from the viewers of the media instance via an interactive browser 809. Here, the interactive browser includes at least two panels—a media panel 810, operable to present, play, and pause the media instance, and a reaction panel 811, operable to display the one or more reactions corresponding to the media instance as well as the key insights provided by the analysis module 806.

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary automatic process to support providing actionable insights based on in-depth analysis of reactions from viewers. Although this figure depicts functional steps in a particular order for purposes of illustration, the process is not limited to any particular order or arrangement of steps. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the various steps portrayed in this figure could be omitted, rearranged, combined and/or adapted in various ways.

Referring to FIG. 9, one or more reactions to a media instance from a plurality of viewers are collected, stored and managed in one or more databases at step 901. At step 902, in-depth analysis is performed on the viewers' reactions using expert knowledge, and actionable insights are generated based on the viewers' reactions and provided to a user at step 903 so that the user can draw its own conclusion on the media instance can/should be improved. At step 904, the one or more reactions can be presented to the user together with the actionable insights to enable the user to draw its own conclusions about the media instance. The configuration used to present the reactions and actionable insights can be saved and tagged with corresponding information, allowing it to be recalled and used for similar analysis in the future.

In some examples, the analysis module is operable to provide insights or present data based in-depth analysis on the viewers' reactions to the media instance on at least one question. An example question is whether the media instance performs most effectively across all demographic groups or especially on a specific demographic group, e.g., older women? Another example question is whether certain elements of the media instance, such as loud noises, were very effective at engaging viewers in a positive, challenging way? Yet another example question is whether thought provoking elements in the media instance were much more engaging to viewers than product shots? Also, an example question includes whether certain characters, such as lead female characters, appearing in the media instance were effective for male viewers and/or across target audiences in the female demographic? Still another example question includes whether physiological responses to the media instance from the viewers were consistent with viewers identifying or associating positively with the characters in the media instance? A further question is whether the media instance was universal—performed well at connecting across gender, age, and income boundaries, or highly polarizing?

The analysis module therefore automates the analysis through use of one or more questions, as described above. The questions provide a context for analyzing and presenting the data or information received from viewers in response to the media instance. The analysis module is configured, using the received data, to answer some number of questions, where answers to the questions provide or correspond to the collected data. When a user desires results from the data for a particular media instance, the user selects a question to which they desire an answer for the media instance. In response to the question selection, the results of the analysis are presented in the form of an answer to the question, where the answer is derived or generated using the data collected and corresponding to the media instance. The results of the analysis can be presented using textual and/or graphical outputs or presentations. The results of the analysis can also be generated and presented using previous knowledge of how to represent the data to answer the question, the previous knowledge coming from similar data analyzed in the past. Furthermore, presentation of data of the media instance can be modified by the user through user or generation of other questions.

The analysis module performs the operations described above in conjunction with the presentation module, where the presentation module includes numerous different renderings for data. In operation, a rendering is specified or selected for a portion of data of a media instance, and the rendering is then tagged with one or more questions that apply to the data. This architecture allows users to modify how data is represented using a set of tools. The system remembers or stores information of how data was represented and the question or question type that was being answered. This information of prior system configurations allows the system, at a subsequent time, to self-configure to answer the same or similar questions for the same media instance or for different media instances. Users thus continually improve the ability of the system to answer questions and improve the quality of data provided in the answers.

In some examples, the presentation module is operable to enable the user to pick a certain section 1001 of the reactions to the media instance 1002, such as the physiological responses 1003 from the viewers shown in the reaction panel 1011 via, for a non-limiting example, “shading”, as shown in FIG. 10. The analysis module 1006 may then perform the analysis requested on the shaded section of media instance and/or physiological responses automatically to illustrate the responses in a way that a lay person can take advantage of expert knowledge in parsing the viewers' reaction. The analyzed results can then be presented to the user in real time and can be shared with other people.

In some examples, the analysis module is operable to analyze the shaded section of the media instance and/or responses by being preprogrammed either by an analyst or the user themselves. Usually, a user is most often interested in a certain number of attributes of the viewers' responses. The analysis module provides the user with insights, conclusions, and findings that they can review from the bottom up. Although the analysis result provides inside and in-depth analysis of the data as well as various possible interpretations of the shaded section of the media instance, which often leaves a conclusion evident, such analysis, however, is no substitute for reaching conclusion by the user. Instead the user is left to draw his/her own conclusion about the section based on the analysis provided.

In some examples, a user may pick a section and choose one of the questions/tasks/requests 1004 that he/she is interested in from a prepared list. The prepared list of questions may include but is not limited to any number of questions. Some example questions follow along with a response evoked in the analysis module.

An example question is “Where were there intense responses to the media instance?” In response the analysis module may calculate the intensity of the responses automatically by looking for high coherence areas of responses.

Another example question is “Does the media instance end on a happy note?” or “Does the audience think the event (e.g., joke) is funny?” In response the analysis module may check if the physiological data shows that viewer acceptance or approval is higher in the end than at the beginning of the media instance.

Yet another example question is “Where do people engage in the spot?” In response to this question the analysis module may check if there is a coherent change in viewers' emotions.

Still another example question is “What is the response to the brand moment?” In response the analysis module may check if thought goes up, but acceptance or approval goes down during the shaded section of the media.

An additional example question is “Which audience does the product introduction work on best?” In response the analysis module analyzes the responses from various segments of the viewers, which include but are not limited to, males, females, gamers, republicans, engagement relative to an industry, etc.

In some examples, the presentation module (FIG. 8, 807) is operable to present the analysis results in response to the questions raised together with the viewers' reactions to the user graphically on the interactive browser. For non-limiting examples, line highlights 1005 and arrows 1006 representing trends in the physiological responses from the viewers can be utilized as shown in FIG. 10, where highlights mark one or more specific physiological responses (e.g., thought in FIG. 10) to be analyzed and the up/down arrows indicate rise/fall in the corresponding responses. In addition, other graphic markings can also be used, which can be but are not limited to, text boxes, viewing data from multiple groups at once (comparing men to women) and any graphic tools that are commonly used to mark anything important. For another non-limiting example, a star, dot and/or other graphic element may be used to mark the point where there is the first coherent change and a circle may be used to mark the one with the strongest response.

In some examples, verbal explanation 1007 of the analysis results in response to the questions raised can be provided to the user together with graphical markings shown in FIG. 10. Such verbal explanation describes the graphical markings (e.g., why an arrow rises, details about the arrow, etc.). For the non-limiting example of an advertisement video clip shown in FIG. 10, verbal explanation 1007 states that “Thought follows a very regular sinusoidal pattern throughout this advertisement. This is often a result of tension-resolution cycles that are used to engage viewers by putting them in situations where they are forced to think intensely about what they are seeing and then rewarding them with the resolution of the situation.” For another non-limiting example of a joke about a man hit by a thrown rock, the verbal explanation may resemble something like: “The falling of the man after being hit by a rock creates the initial coherent, positive response in liking. This shows that the actual rock throw is not funny, but the arc that the person's body takes is. After the body hits the ground, the response reverts to neutral and there are no further changes in emotions during this section.”

In some examples, with reference to FIG. 8, an optional authentication module 813 is operable to authenticate identity of the user requesting access to the media instance and the verbatim reactions remotely over a network 812. Here, the network can be but is not limited to, internet, intranet, wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), wireless network, Bluetooth, and mobile communication network.

In some examples, optional user database 814 stores information of users who are allowed to access the media instances and the verbatim reactions from the viewers, and the specific media instances and the reactions each user is allowed to access. The access module 810 may add or remove a user for access, and limit or expand the list of media instances and/or reactions the user can access and/or the analysis features the user can use by checking the user's login name and password. Such authorization/limitation on a user's access can be determined to based upon who the user is, e.g., different amounts of information for different types of users. For a non-limiting example, Company ABC can have access to certain ads and feedbacks from viewers' reactions to the ads, to which Company XYZ cannot have access or can have only limited access.

In some examples, a specific media instance is synchronized with physiological responses to the media instance from a plurality of viewers continuously over the entire time duration of the media instance. Once the media instance and the physiological responses are synchronized, an interactive browser enables a user to navigate through the media instance (or the physiological responses) in one panel while presenting the corresponding physiological responses (or the section of the media instance) at the same point in time in another panel.

The interactive browser allows the user to select a section/scene from the media instance, correlate, present, and compare the viewers' physiological responses to the particular section. Alternatively, the user may monitor the viewers' physiological responses continuously as the media instance is being displayed. Being able to see the continuous (instead of static snapshot of) changes in physiological responses and the media instance side by side and compare aggregated physiological responses from the viewers to a specific event of the media instance in an interactive way enables the user to obtain better understanding of the true reaction from the viewers to whatever stimuli being presented to them.

FIG. 11 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support synchronization of media with physiological responses from viewers of the media. Although this diagram depicts components as functionally separate, such depiction is merely for illustrative purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the components portrayed in this figure can be arbitrarily combined or divided into separate software, firmware and/or hardware components. Furthermore, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that such components, regardless of how they are combined or divided, can execute on the same computing device or multiple computing devices, and wherein the multiple computing devices can be connected by one or more networks.

Referring to FIG. 11, a synchronization module 1103 is operable to synchronize and correlate a media instance 1101 with one or more physiological responses 1102 aggregated from one or more viewers of the media instance continuously at each and every moment over the entire duration of the media instance. Here, the media instance and its pertinent data can be stored in a media database 1104, and the one or more physiological responses aggregated from the viewers can be stored in a reaction database 1105, respectively. An interactive browser 1106 comprises at least two panels including a media panel 1107, which is operable to present, play, and pause the media instance, and a reaction panel 1108, which is operable to display and compare the one or more physiological responses (e.g., Adrenaline, Liking, and Thought) corresponding to the media instance as lines (traces) in a two-dimensional line graph. A horizontal axis of the graph represents time, and a vertical axis represents the amplitude (intensity) of the one or more physiological responses. A cutting line 1109 marks the physiological responses from the viewers to the current scene (event, section, or moment in time) of the media instance, wherein the cutting line can be chosen by the user and move in coordination with the media instance being played. The interactive browser enables the user to select an event/section/scene/moment from the media instance presented in the media panel 1107 and correlate, present, and compare the viewers' physiological responses to the particular section in the reaction panel 1108. Conversely, interactive browser also enables the user to select the cutting line 1109 of physiological responses from the viewers in the reaction panel 1108 at any specific moment, and the corresponding media section or scene can be identified and presented in the media panel 1107.

In some examples, the synchronization module 1103 synchronizes and correlates a media instance 1101 with one or more physiological responses 1102 aggregated from a plurality of viewers of the media instance by synchronizing each event of the media. The physiological response data of a person includes but is not limited to heart rate, brain waves, electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, blink rate, breathing, motion, muscle movement, galvanic skin response, skin temperature, and any other physiological response of the person. The physiological response data corresponding to each event or point in time is then retrieved from the media database 1104. The data is offset to account for cognitive delays in the human brain corresponding to the signal collected (e.g., the cognitive delay of the brain associated with human vision is different than the cognitive delay associated with auditory information) and processing delays of the system, and then synchronized with the media instance 1101. Optionally, an additional offset may be applied to the physiological response data 1102 of each individual to account for time zone differences between the viewer and reaction database 1105.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support synchronization of media with physiological responses from viewers of the media. Although this figure depicts functional steps in a particular order for purposes of illustration, the process is not limited to any particular order or arrangement of steps. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the various steps portrayed in this figure could be omitted, rearranged, combined and/or adapted in various ways.

Referring to FIG. 12, a media instance is synchronized with one or more physiological responses aggregated from a plurality of viewers of the media instance continuously at each and every moment over the entire duration of the media instance at step 1201. At step 1202, the synchronized media instance and the one or more physiological responses from the viewers are presented side-by-side. An event/section/scene/moment from the media instance can be selected at step 1203, and the viewers' physiological responses to the particular section can be correlated, presented, and compared at step 1204. Alternatively, the viewers' physiological responses can be monitored continuously as the media instance is being displayed at step 1205.

In some examples, with reference to FIG. 11, an aggregation module 1110 is operable to retrieve from the reaction database 1105 and aggregate the physiological responses to the media instance across the plurality of viewers and present each of the aggregated responses as a function over the duration of the media instance. The aggregated responses to the media instance can be calculated via one or more of: max, min, average, deviation, or a higher ordered approximation of the intensity of the physiological responses from the viewers.

In some examples, change (trend) in amplitude of the aggregated responses is a good measure of the quality of the media instance. If the media instance is able to change viewers emotions up and down in a strong manner (for a non-limiting example, mathematical deviation of the response is large), such strong change in amplitude corresponds to a good media instance that puts the viewers into different emotional states. In contrast, a poor performing media instance does not put the viewers into different emotional states. Such information can be used by media designers to identify if the media instance is eliciting the desired response and which key events/scenes/sections of the media instance need to be changed in order to match the desired response. A good media instance should contain multiple moments/scenes/events that are intense and produce positive amplitude of response across viewers. A media instance failed to create such responses may not achieve what the creators of the media instance have intended.

In some examples, the media instance can be divided up into instances of key moments/events/scenes/segments/sections in the profile, wherein such key events can be identified and/tagged according to the type of the media instance. In the case of video games, such key events include but are not limited to, elements of a video game such as levels, cut scenes, major fights, battles, conversations, etc. In the case of Web sites, such key events include but are not limited to, progression of Web pages, key parts of a Web page, advertisements shown, content, textual content, video, animations, etc. In the case of an interactive media/movie/ads, such key events can be but are not limited to, chapters, scenes, scene types, character actions, events (for non-limiting examples, car chases, explosions, kisses, deaths, jokes) and key characters in the movie.

In some examples, an event module 1111 can be used to quickly identify a numbers of moments/events/scenes/segments/sections in the media instance retrieved from the media database 1104 and then automatically calculate the length of each event. The event module may enable each user, or a trained administrator, to identify and tag the important events in the media instance so that, once the “location” (current event) in the media instance (relative to other pertinent events in the media instance) is selected by the user, the selected event may be better correlated with the aggregated responses from the viewers.

In some examples, the events in the media instance can be identified, automatically if possible, through one or more applications that parse user actions in an environment (e.g., virtual environment, real environment, online environment, etc.) either before the viewer's interaction with the media instance in the case of non-interactive media such as a movie, or afterwards by reviewing the viewer's interaction with the media instance through recorded video, a log of actions or other means. In video games, web sites and other electronic interactive media instance, the program that administers the media can create this log and thus automate the process.

An example enables graphical presentation and analysis of verbatim comments and feedbacks from a plurality of viewers to a specific media instance. These verbatim comments are first collected from the viewers and stored in a database before being analyzed and categorized into various categories. Once categorized, the comments can then be presented to a user in various graphical formats, allowing the user to obtain an intuitive visual impression of the positive/negative reactions to and/or the most impressive characteristics of the specific media instance as perceived by the viewers.

An example enables graphical presentation and analysis of verbatim comments and feedbacks from a plurality of viewers to a specific media instance. These verbatim comments are first collected from the viewers and stored in a database before being analyzed and categorized into various categories. Once categorized, the comments can then be presented to a user in various graphical formats, allowing the user to obtain an intuitive visual impression of the positive/negative reactions to and/or the most impressive characteristics of the specific media instance, as perceived by the viewers. Instead of parsing through and dissecting the comments and feedbacks word by word, the user is now able to visually evaluate how well the media instance is being received by the viewers at a glance.

FIG. 13 is an illustration of an exemplary system to support graphical presentation of verbatim comments from viewers. Although this diagram depicts components as functionally separate, such depiction is merely for illustrative purposes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the components portrayed in this figure can be arbitrarily combined or divided into separate software, firmware and/or hardware components. Furthermore, it will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that such components, regardless of how they are combined or divided, can execute on the same computing device or multiple computing devices, and wherein the multiple computing devices can be connected by one or more networks.

Referring to FIG. 13, a collection module 1303 is operable to collect, record, store and manage verbatim reactions 1302 (comments and feedbacks) from a plurality of viewers of a media instance 1301. Here, the media instance and its pertinent data can be stored in a media database 1304, and the verbatim reactions from the viewers can be stored in a reaction database 1305, respectively. An analysis module 1306 is operable to analyze the verbatim comments from the viewers and categorize them into the plurality of categories. A presentation module 1307 is operable to retrieve and categorize the verbatim reactions to the media instance into various categories, and then present these verbatim reactions to a user 1308 based on their categories in graphical forms via an interactive browser 1309. The interactive browser includes at least two panels—a media panel 1310, which is operable to present, play, and pause the media instance, and a comments panel 1311, which is operable to display not only the one or more reactions corresponding to the media instance, but also one or more graphical categorization and presentation of the verbatim reactions to provide the user with both a verbal and/or a visual perception and interpretation of the feedbacks from the viewers.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process to support graphical presentation of verbatim comments from viewers. Although this figure depicts functional steps in a particular order for purposes of illustration, the process is not limited to any particular order or arrangement of steps. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the various steps portrayed in this figure could be omitted, rearranged, combined and/or adapted in various ways.

Referring to FIG. 14, verbatim reactions to a media instance from a plurality of viewers are collected, stored and managed at step 1401. At step 1402, the collected verbatim reactions are analyzed and categorized into various categories. The categorized comments are then retrieved and presented to a user in graphical forms based on the categories at step 1403, enabling the user to visually interpret the reactions from the viewers at step 1404.

In some examples, the viewers of the media instance are free to write what they like and don't like about the media instance, and the verbatim (free flowing text) comments or feedbacks 501 from the viewers can be recorded and presented in the comments panel 111 verbatim as shown in FIG. 4 described above. In some examples, the analysis module is operable to further characterize the comments in each of the plurality of categories as positive or negative based on the words used in each of the comments. Once characterized, the number of positive or negative comments in each of the categories can be summed up. For a non-limiting example, comments from viewers on a certain type of events, like combat, can be characterized and summed up as being 40% positive, while 60% negative. Such an approach avoids single verbatim response from bias the responses from a group of viewers, making it easy for the user to understand how viewers would react to every aspect of the media instance.

In some examples, the analysis module is operable to characterize the viewers' comments about the media instance as positive or negative in a plurality of categories/topics/aspects related to the product, wherein such categories include but are not limited to, product, event, logo, song, spokesperson, jokes, narrative, key events, storyline. These categories may not be predetermined, but instead be extracted from the analysis of their comments.

In some examples, the presentation module is operable to present summation of the viewers' positive and negative comments to various aspects/topics/events of the media instance to the user (creator of the media instance) in a bubble graph, as shown in FIG. 15. The vertical axis 1501 and horizontal axis 1502 of the bubble graph represent the percentage of positive or negative comments from the viewers about the media instance, respectively. Each bubble 1503 in the graph represents one of the topics the viewers have commented upon, marked by the name of the event and the percentages of the viewers' negative and positive feedbacks on the event. The size of the bubble represents the number of viewers commenting on this specific aspect of the media instance, and the location of the bubble on the graph indicates whether the comments from the viewers are predominantly positive or negative.

In some examples, the verbatim comments from the viewers can be analyzed, and key words and concepts (adjectives) can be extracted and presented in a word cloud, as shown in FIG. 16, rendering meaningful information from the verbatim comments more accessible. Every word in the word cloud is represented by a circle, square, any other commonly used geometric shape or simply by the word itself as shown in FIG. 16. Each representation is associated with a corresponding weight represented using font sizes or other visual clues. For the non-limiting example in FIG. 16, the size of each word in the word cloud represents the number of times or percentages of the viewers use the word in their responses. This is useful as a means of displaying “popularity” of an adjective that has been democratically ‘voted’ on to describe the media instance and where precise results are not desired. Here, the three most popular adjectives used to describe the media instance are “fun”, “cool”, and “boring”.

In some examples, the viewers may simply be asked to answer a specific question, for example, “What are three adjectives that best describe your response to this media.” The adjectives in the viewers' responses to the question can then be collected, categorized, and summed up, and presented in a Word cloud. Alternatively, the adjectives the viewers used to describe their responses to the media instance may be extracted from collected survey data.

In some examples, with reference to FIG. 13, an optional authentication module 1313 is operable to authenticate identity of the user requesting access to the media instance and the verbatim reactions remotely over a network 1313. Here, the network can be but is not limited to, internet, intranet, wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), wireless network, Bluetooth, and mobile communication network.

In some examples, optional user database 1314 stores information of users who are allowed to access the media instances and the verbatim reactions from the viewers, and the specific media instances and the reactions each user is allowed to access. The access module 1310 may add or remove a user for access, and limit or expand the list of media instances and/or reactions the user can access and/or the analysis features the user can use by checking the user's login name and password. Such authorization/limitation on a user's access can be determined to based upon who the user is, e.g., different amounts of information for different types of users. For a non-limiting example, Company ABC can have access to certain ads and feedback from viewers' reactions to the ads, while Company XYZ cannot have access or can only have limited access to the same ads and/or feedback.

Some of the examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance, the media instance including a plurality of media events; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers while the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance; generating aggregated reaction data by aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers; generating synchronized data by synchronizing the plurality of media events of the media instance with corresponding aggregated reaction data; and providing controlled access to the synchronized data from a remote device.

The method of a disclosed example comprises providing, via the controlled access, remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data synchronized to corresponding events of the media instance.

The manipulation of a disclosed example includes at least one of dividing, dissecting, aggregating, parsing, organizing, and analyzing the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises providing controlled access to at least one of the reaction data and aggregated reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling via the controlled access interactive analysis of at least one of the media instance and the synchronized data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling via the controlled access interactive analysis of at least one of the reaction data, the aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes at least one of physiological responses, survey results, feedback generated by the viewers, metadata, and derived statistics.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes physiological responses.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes survey results.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes feedback generated by the viewers.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes metadata, wherein the metadata is event-based metadata.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes derived statistics, wherein the derived statistics are derived statistics for indicators of success and failure of the media instance

Receiving the reaction data of a disclosed example comprises receiving the reaction data from a plurality of sensor devices via wireless couplings, wherein each viewer wears a sensor device of the plurality of sensor devices.

The method of a disclosed example comprises presenting a user interface (UI), wherein the controlled access is made via the UI.

The method of a disclosed example comprises presenting the synchronized data using a rendering of a plurality or renderings.

The plurality of renderings of a disclosed example includes text, charts, graphs, histograms, images, and video.

The aggregating of a disclosed example comprises aggregating the reaction data according to at least one of maximums, minimums, averages, deviations, derivatives, amplitudes, and trends of at least one parameter of the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting, via the controlled access, a portion of the media instance for which at least one of the synchronized data, the reaction data, the aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data is viewed. The portion of a disclosed example includes a point in time. The portion of a disclosed example includes a period of time.

The method of a disclosed example comprises automatically analyzing the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises providing remote access to results of the analyzing, and presenting the results, the presenting including presenting actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance via at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein the actionable insights correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes applying expert knowledge of physiological behavior to the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises generating a first set of questions that represent the results.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the first set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The method of a disclosed example comprises tagging the selected rendering with at least one question of the first set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify the presenting of the results via the selecting of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The presenting of a disclosed example includes presenting the results via presentation of the first set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises, in response to the user selecting a question of the first set of questions, presenting an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The method of a disclosed example comprises receiving comments from the plurality of viewers in response to the viewing. The comments of a disclosed example are textual comments. The synchronized data of a disclosed example includes the comments.

The method of a disclosed example comprises presenting survey questions to the plurality of viewers, the survey questions relating to the media instance. The method of a disclosed example comprises receiving answers to the survey questions from the plurality of viewers. The answers to the survey questions of a disclosed example are textual comments. The synchronized data of a disclosed example includes the answers to the survey questions.

The plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a location.

The plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a plurality of locations.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a first location and a second set of the plurality of viewers is at a second location different from the first location.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is viewing the media instance at a first time and a second set of the plurality of viewers is viewing the media instance at a second time different from the first time.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in brain tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in muscle tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in heart tissue of the user.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers; and providing remote access to at least one of the reaction data and aggregated reaction data, wherein the remote access enables interactive analysis of at least one of the media instance, the reaction data, aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers; and enabling remote interactive analysis of the media instance and at least one of the reaction data, aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; and enabling remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data synchronized to corresponding events of the media instance, the manipulation including at least one of dividing, dissecting, aggregating, parsing, and analyzing the reaction data.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database including a media instance and reaction data, the media instance comprising a plurality of media events, the reaction data received from a plurality of viewers viewing the media instance; a first module coupled to the processor, the first module generating aggregated reaction data by aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers, the first module generating synchronized data by synchronizing the plurality of media events of the media instance with corresponding aggregated reaction data; and a second module coupled to the processor, the second module comprising a plurality of renderings and a user interface (UI) that provide controlled access to the synchronized data from a remote device.

The controlled access of a disclosed example is through the UI and includes remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data synchronized to corresponding events of the media instance.

The manipulation of a disclosed example includes at least one of dividing, dissecting, aggregating, parsing, organizing, and analyzing the reaction data.

The controlled access of a disclosed example includes access to at least one of the reaction data and aggregated reaction data.

The controlled access of a disclosed example includes interactive analysis of at least one of the media instance and the synchronized data.

The controlled access of a disclosed example includes interactive analysis of at least one of the reaction data, the aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

The plurality of renderings of a disclosed example includes text, charts, graphs, histograms, images, and video.

The UI of a disclosed example presents the synchronized data using at least one rendering of the plurality or renderings.

The UI of a disclosed example allows selection of a portion of the media instance for which at least one of the synchronized data, the reaction data, the aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data is viewed. The portion of a disclosed example includes a point in time. The portion of a disclosed example includes a period of time.

The first module of a disclosed example analyzes the reaction data.

The UI of a disclosed example provides remote access to results of the analysis.

The UI of a disclosed example presents the results using at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings, the results including actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance.

The actionable insights of a disclosed example correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

The analyzing of a disclosed example comprises applying expert knowledge of physiological behavior to the reaction data.

The system of a disclosed example comprises generating a first set of questions that represent the results.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the first set of questions.

The system of a disclosed example comprises selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The system of a disclosed example comprises tagging the selected rendering with at least one question of the first set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify presentation of the results via the UI by selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The presenting of a disclosed example includes presenting the results via presentation of the first set of questions on the UI.

The system of a disclosed example comprises, in response to the user selecting a question of the first set of questions, presenting via the UI an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes at least one of physiological responses, survey results, feedback generated by the viewers, metadata, and derived statistics.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes physiological responses.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes survey results.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes feedback generated by the viewers.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes metadata. The metadata of a disclosed example is event-based metadata.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes derived statistics. The derived statistics of a disclosed example are derived statistics for indicators of success and failure of the media instance.

The system of a disclosed example comprises a plurality of sensor devices, wherein each viewer wears a sensor device of the plurality of sensor devices, wherein each sensor device receives the reaction data from a corresponding view and transmits the reaction data to at least one of the first module and the database.

The aggregating of a disclosed example comprises aggregating the reaction data according to at least one of maximums, minimums, averages, deviations, derivatives, amplitudes, and trends of at least one parameter of the reaction data.

The system of a disclosed example comprises a third module coupled to the second module, the third module receiving comments from the plurality of viewers in response to the viewing. The comments of a disclosed example are textual comments. The synchronized data of a disclosed example includes the comments.

The system of a disclosed example comprises a third module coupled to the second module, the third module presenting survey questions to the plurality of viewers via the UI, the survey questions relating to the media instance.

The third module of a disclosed example receives answers to the survey questions from the plurality of viewers via the UI. The answers to the survey questions of a disclosed example are textual comments. The synchronized data of a disclosed example includes the answers to the survey questions.

The plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a location.

The plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a plurality of locations.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a first location and a second set of the plurality of viewers are at a second location different from the first location.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is viewing the media instance at a first time and a second set of the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance at a second time different from the first time.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in brain tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in muscle tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in heart tissue of the user.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database including a media instance and reaction data of a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; a first module that aggregates the reaction data from the plurality of viewers; and a second module that provides remote access to at least one of the reaction data and aggregated reaction data, wherein the remote access enables interactive analysis of at least one of the media instance, the reaction data, aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database receiving a media instance and reaction data from a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; a first module aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers; and a second module enabling remote interactive analysis and presentation of the media instance and at least one of the reaction data, aggregated reaction data, and parsed reaction data.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database receiving a media instance and reaction data from a plurality of viewers, the reaction data generated in response to viewing of the media instance and including physiological response data; and an interface coupled to the processor, the interface enabling remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data synchronized to corresponding events of the media instance, the manipulation including at least one of dividing, dissecting, aggregating, parsing, and analyzing the reaction data.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance, the media instance including a plurality of media events; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers while the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance; automatically analyzing the reaction data; and providing remote access to results of the analyzing, and presenting the results, the presenting including presenting actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance via at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein the actionable insights correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes applying expert knowledge of physiological behavior to the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises generating a first set of questions that represent the results.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the first set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The method of a disclosed example comprises tagging the selected rendering with at least one question of the first set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify the presenting of the results via the selecting of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The presenting of a disclosed example includes presenting the results via presentation of the first set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises, in response to the user selecting a question of the first set of questions, presenting an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting a second set of questions that represent the results, wherein the second set of questions were generated prior to the first set of questions to represent previous results from analysis of preceding reaction data of a preceding media instance, wherein the preceding reaction data is similar to the reaction data.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the second set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The method of a disclosed example comprises tagging the selected rendering with at least one question of the second set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify the presenting of the results via the selecting of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The presenting of a disclosed example includes presenting the results via presentation of the second set of questions.

The method of a disclosed example comprises, in response to the user selecting a question of the second set of questions, presenting an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The method of a disclosed example comprises selecting a set of the reaction data to which the analyzing is applied, the selecting including selecting a portion of the media instance to which the set of the reaction data corresponds. The portion of a disclosed example includes a point in time. The portion of a disclosed example includes a period of time.

The method of a disclosed example comprises generating aggregated reaction data by aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers.

The aggregating of a disclosed example comprises aggregating the reaction data according to at least one of maximums, minimums, averages, deviations, derivatives, amplitudes, and trends of at least one parameter of the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises generating synchronized data by synchronizing the plurality of media events of the media instance with the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the media instance.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the plurality of renderings.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the actionable insights.

The plurality of renderings of a disclosed example includes text, charts, graphs, histograms, images, and video.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes at least one of physiological responses, survey results, feedback generated by the viewers, metadata, and derived statistics

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes physiological responses

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes survey results.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes feedback generated by the viewers.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes metadata, wherein the metadata is event-based metadata.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes derived statistics, wherein the derived statistics are derived statistics for indicators of success and failure of the media instance.

Receiving the reaction data of a disclosed example comprises receiving the reaction data from a plurality of sensor devices via wireless couplings, wherein each viewer wears a sensor device of the plurality of sensor devices.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in brain tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in muscle tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in heart tissue of the user.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a first location and a second set of the plurality of viewers is at a second location different from the first location

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is viewing the media instance at a first time and a second set of the plurality of viewers is viewing the media instance at a second time different from the first time.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers while the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance; automatically analyzing the reaction data; and presenting the results by presenting actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance via at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein the actionable insights correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

Examples described herein include a method comprising: receiving a media instance; receiving reaction data from a plurality of viewers viewing the media instance; analyzing the reaction data; and presenting results of the analyzing by presenting a set of questions corresponding to a portion of the media instance, the set of questions corresponding to at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein answers to questions of the set of questions present actionable insights of the reaction data, the actionable insights corresponding to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database including a media instance and reaction data, the media instance including a plurality of media events, the reaction data received from a plurality of viewers while the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance; a first module coupled to the processor, the first module analyzing the reaction data; and a second module coupled to the processor, the second module comprising a plurality of renderings and a user interface (UI) that provide remote access to results of the analyzing and the results, the results including actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance, wherein the actionable insights correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes applying expert knowledge of physiological behavior to the reaction data.

The first module of a disclosed example generates a first set of questions that represent the results.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the first set of questions.

At least one of the second module and the UI of a disclosed example enables selection of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

At least one of the second module and the UI of a disclosed example enables tagging of a selected rendering with at least one question of the first set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify presentation of the results via the UI by selecting at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

At least one of the second module and the UI of a disclosed example presents the results via presentation of the first set of questions.

In response to receipt of a selected question of the first set of questions, the second module of a disclosed example presents an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The first module of a disclosed example selects a second set of questions that represent the results, wherein the second set of questions were generated prior to the first set of questions to represent previous results from analysis of preceding reaction data of a preceding media instance, wherein the preceding reaction data is similar to the reaction data.

The analyzing of a disclosed example includes analyzing the reaction data in the context of the second set of questions.

The UI of a disclosed example enables selection of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

The method of a disclosed example comprises tagging the selected rendering with at least one question of the second set of questions.

A user of a disclosed example can modify presentation of the results via the UI by the selecting of at least one rendering of the plurality of renderings.

At least one of the second module and the UI of a disclosed example presents the results via presentation of the second set of questions.

In response to the user selecting a question of the second set of questions, at least one of the second module and the UI of a disclosed example presents an answer to the selected question that includes the actionable insight.

The UI of a disclosed example enables selection of a set of the reaction data to which the analyzing is applied, the selecting including selecting a portion of the media instance to which the set of the reaction data corresponds. The portion of a disclosed example includes a point in time. The portion of a disclosed example includes a period of time.

The first module of a disclosed example generates aggregated reaction data by aggregating the reaction data from the plurality of viewers.

The aggregating of a disclosed example comprises aggregating the reaction data according to at least one of maximums, minimums, averages, deviations, derivatives, amplitudes, and trends of at least one parameter of the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises generating synchronized data by synchronizing the plurality of media events of the media instance with the reaction data.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the media instance via the UI.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the reaction data via the UI.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the plurality of renderings via the UI.

The method of a disclosed example comprises enabling remote interactive manipulation of the actionable insights via the UI.

The plurality of renderings of a disclosed example includes text, charts, graphs, histograms, images, and video.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes at least one of physiological responses, survey results, feedback generated by the viewers, metadata, and derived statistics.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes physiological responses.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes survey results.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes feedback generated by the viewers.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes metadata, wherein the metadata is event-based metadata.

The reaction data of a disclosed example includes derived statistics, wherein the derived statistics are derived statistics for indicators of success and failure of the media instance.

The method of a disclosed example comprises a plurality of sensor devices, wherein each viewer wears a sensor device of the plurality of sensor devices, wherein each sensor device receives the reaction data from a corresponding view and transmits the reaction data to at least one of the first module and the database.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in brain tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in muscle tissue of the user.

The reaction data of a disclosed example corresponds to electrical activity in heart tissue of the user.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a first location and a second set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is at a second location different from the first location.

A first set of the plurality of viewers of a disclosed example is viewing the media instance at a first time and a second set of the plurality of viewers is viewing the media instance at a second time different from the first time.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database receiving a media instance and reaction data from a plurality of viewers while the plurality of viewers are viewing the media instance; a first module coupled to the processor, the first module automatically analyzing the reaction data; and a second module coupled to the processor, the second module presenting the results by presenting actionable insights corresponding to a portion of the media instance via at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein the actionable insights correspond to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

Examples described herein include a system comprising: a processor coupled to a database, the database receiving a media instance and reaction data from a plurality of viewers viewing the media instance; a first module coupled to the processor, the first module analyzing the reaction data; and a second module coupled to the processor, the second module presenting results of the analyzing by presenting a set of questions corresponding to a portion of the media instance, the set of questions corresponding to at least one of a plurality of renderings, wherein answers to questions of the set of questions present actionable insights of the reaction data, the actionable insights corresponding to emotional reactions of the plurality of viewers.

Examples described herein may be implemented using a conventional general purpose or a specialized digital computer or microprocessor(s) programmed according to the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the computer art Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those skilled in the software art. The teachings of this disclosure may also be implemented by the preparation of integrated circuits or by interconnecting an appropriate network of conventional component circuits, as will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

A disclosed example includes a computer program product which is a machine readable medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program one or more computing devices to perform any of the features presented herein. The machine readable medium can include, but is not limited to, one or more types of disks including floppy disks, optical discs, DVD, CD-ROMs, micro drive, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, DRAMs, VRAMs, flash memory devices, magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data. Stored on any one of the computer readable medium (media), the teachings of the present disclosure include software for controlling both the hardware of the general purpose/specialized computer or microprocessor, and for enabling the computer or microprocessor to interact with a human viewer or other mechanism utilizing the results of the teachings of this disclosure. Such software may include, but is not limited to, device drivers, operating systems, execution environments/containers, and applications.

The examples described herein include and/or run under and/or in association with a processing system. The processing system includes any collection of processor-based devices or computing devices operating together, or components of processing systems or devices, as is known in the art. For example, the processing system can include one or more of a portable computer, portable communication device operating in a communication network, and/or a network server. The portable computer can be any of a number and/or combination of devices selected from among personal computers, cellular telephones, personal digital assistants, portable computing devices, and portable communication devices, but is not so limited. The processing system can include components within a larger computer system.

The processing system of a disclosed example includes at least one processor and at least one memory device or subsystem. The processing system can also include or be coupled to at least one database. The term “processor” as generally used herein refers to any logic processing unit, such as one or more central processing units (CPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), etc. The processor and memory can be monolithically integrated onto a single chip, distributed among a number of chips or components of the systems described herein, and/or provided by some combination of algorithms. The methods described herein can be implemented in one or more of software algorithm(s), programs, firmware, hardware, components, circuitry, in any combination.

The components described herein can be located together or in separate locations. Communication paths couple the components and include any medium for communicating or transferring files among the components. The communication paths include wireless connections, wired connections, and hybrid wireless/wired connections. The communication paths also include couplings or connections to networks including local area networks (LANs), metropolitan area networks (MANs), wide area networks (WANs), proprietary networks, interoffice or backend networks, and the Internet. Furthermore, the communication paths include removable fixed mediums like floppy disks, hard disk drives, and CD-ROM disks, as well as flash RAM, Universal Serial Bus (USB) connections, RS-232 connections, telephone lines, buses, and electronic mail messages.

Aspects of the systems and methods described herein may be implemented as functionality programmed into any of a variety of circuitry, including programmable logic devices (PLDs), such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), programmable array logic (PAL) devices, electrically programmable logic and memory devices and standard cell-based devices, as well as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Some other possibilities for implementing aspects of the systems and methods include: microcontrollers with memory (such as electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM)), embedded microprocessors, firmware, software, etc. Furthermore, aspects of the systems and methods may be embodied in microprocessors having software-based circuit emulation, discrete logic (sequential and combinatorial), custom devices, fuzzy (neural) logic, quantum devices, and hybrids of any of the above device types. Of course the underlying device technologies may be provided in a variety of component types, e.g., metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technologies like complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), bipolar technologies like emitter-coupled logic (ECL), polymer technologies (e.g., silicon-conjugated polymer and metal-conjugated polymer-metal structures), mixed analog and digital, etc.

It should be noted that any system, method, and/or other components disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, non-volatile storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media) and carrier waves that may be used to transfer such formatted data and/or instructions through wireless, optical, or wired signaling media or any combination thereof. Examples of transfers of such formatted data and/or instructions by carrier waves include, but are not limited to, transfers (uploads, downloads, e-mail, etc.) over the Internet and/or other computer networks via one or more data transfer protocols (e.g., HTTP, HTTPs, FTP, SMTP, WAP, etc.). When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described components may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number respectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. When the word “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list and any combination of the items in the list.

The above description of example systems and methods is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the systems and methods to the precise forms disclosed. While specific examples of, and examples for, the systems and methods are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the systems and methods, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. The teachings of the systems and methods provided herein can be applied to other systems and methods, not only for the systems and methods described above.

The elements and acts of the various examples described above can be combined to provide other examples. These and other changes can be made to the systems and methods in light of the above detailed description.

In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific examples disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all systems and methods under the claims. Accordingly, the examples are not limited by the disclosure, but instead the scope of the examples is to be determined entirely by the claims.

While certain aspects of the examples are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the examples in any number of claim forms. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects disclosed in the various examples. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising a processor, the processor implements: an electronic synchronizer to: determine a total amount to offset first-neuro-response data gathered from an audience member exposed to media to align the first neuro-response data with second neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the audience member, the first neuro-response data associated with a first sensory component of the media and the second neuro-response data associated with a second sensory component of the media, the total amount to offset based on a first cognitive delay of a brain of the audience member associated with the first neuro-response data and a second cognitive delay of the brain of the audience member associated with the second neuro-response data, wherein the first sensory component of the media is observed by a first sense of the audience member and the second sensory component of the media is observed by a second sense of the audience member different than the first sense; and time shift at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response based on the total amount to form aligned data; and an electronic analyzer to: determine an effectiveness of the media based on the aligned data; receive a user request for a first study of a plurality of studies; analyze one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness to determine an analysis result for the first study; output a first rendering of a plurality of renderings for display of the analysis result with the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness; and synchronize a display of a respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with a display of a first portion of the first rendering and synchronize a display of a respective second portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with a display of a second portion of the first rendering.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first sensory component of the media includes a visual component and the second sensory component of the media includes an auditory component.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first cognitive delay is different from the second cognitive delay.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the audience member is a first audience member and the aligned data is first aligned data and the electronic synchronizer is to time shift one or more of third neuro-response data or fourth neuro-response data gathered from a second audience member exposed to the media to align the third neuro-response data and the fourth neuro-response data to form second aligned data, the third neuro-response data and the fourth neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the second audience member, the third neuro-response data associated with the first sensory component and the fourth neuro-response data associated with the second sensory component.
 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the electronic analyzer is to: perform a comparison of the first aligned data and the second aligned data; and determine the effectiveness of the media based on the comparison.
 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the electronic analyzer is to aggregate the first aligned data with the second aligned data to form aggregated data to be displayed with the media.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the electronic synchronizer is to time shift one or more of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response data by a preliminary amount to account for a time zone difference between a location of the audience member and a location of the electronic synchronizer.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the aligned data is first aligned data and the electronic synchronizer is to time shift third neuro-response data gathered from the audience member to align the third neuro-response with fourth neuro-response data to form second aligned data, the third neuro-response data and the fourth neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the audience member at a point in time subsequent to the gathering of the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data, the third neuro-response data associated with the first sensory component and the second neuro-response data associated with the second sensory component.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the electronic synchronizer is to aggregate the first aligned data and the second aligned data to form aggregated data.
 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the electronic analyzer is to determine the effectiveness based on the aggregated data.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the electronic analyzer is to: tag the plurality of renderings with one or more of the plurality of studies; and configure a display to present one or more of the plurality of renderings in response to a user request for a second study based on the tagging.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the media is first media and the first study is for the first media and the second study is for second media different from the first media.
 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the media includes a first media instance and a second media instance, the electronic analyzer to output the first rendering to be displayed based on the first media instance and dynamically update the output for display of a second rendering based on the second media instance.
 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the electronic analyzer is to graphically mark a portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness based on the analysis result.
 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the first rendering further includes at least a portion of the media.
 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the electronic analyzer is to synchronize the display of the respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with the display of the first portion of the first rendering based on a first user input associated with the first rendering, the first user input received via an interface for display of the first rendering.
 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the electronic analyzer is to substantially continuously synchronize the display of the respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with the display of the first portion of the first rendering.
 18. A system comprising: a processor to: offset at least one of first neuro-response data representing a first response to a visual component of media gathered from an audience member exposed to the media and second neuro-response data representing a second response to an auditory component of the media gathered from the audience member exposed to the media based on a first cognitive delay of a brain of the audience member and a second cognitive delay of the brain of the audience member to synchronize the at least one of the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data with the media, the first cognitive delay and the second cognitive delay being different; receive a user request for a first study of a plurality of studies; analyze one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data to determine an analysis result for the first study; output a first rendering of a plurality of renderings for display of the analysis result with the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data; and synchronize a display of a respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data with a display of a first portion of the first rendering and synchronize a display of a respective second portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data with a display of a second portion of the first rendering; and a database to store one or more of the media, the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the synchronized neuro-response data, the analysis result, or the first rendering.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the processor is to offset the at least one of the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data substantially continuously over a duration of the media.
 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the media includes a plurality of events and the processor is to identify an event in the media and synchronize the event with the at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response data.
 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the processor is to aggregate neuro-response data for a plurality of audience members exposed to the media with the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data.
 22. The system of claim 21, wherein the processor is to identify a change in amplitude in the aggregated neuro-response data.
 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the change in amplitude is indicative of a change in an emotional state of at least one person of the plurality of audience members.
 24. The system of claim 22, wherein the processor is to identify the media as a success or a failure in invoking an emotional response across the plurality of audience members based on the change in amplitude.
 25. A method comprising: determining, by executing an instruction with a processor, a total amount to offset first-neuro-response data gathered from an audience member exposed to media to align the first neuro-response data with second neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the audience member, the first neuro-response data associated with a first sensory component of the media and the second neuro-response data associated with a second sensory component of the media, the total amount to offset based on a first cognitive delay of a brain of the audience member associated with the first neuro-response data and a second cognitive delay of the brain of the audience member associated with the second neuro-response data, wherein the first sensory component of the media is observed by a first sense of the audience member and the second sensory component of the media is observed by a second sense of the audience member different than the first sense; time shifting, by executing an instruction with the processor, at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response based on the total amount to form aligned data; determining, by executing an instruction with the processor, an effectiveness of the media based on the aligned data; receiving a user request for a first study of a plurality of studies; analyzing, by executing an instruction with the processor, one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness to determine an analysis result for the first study; outputting, by executing an instruction with the processor, a first rendering of a plurality of renderings for display of the analysis result with the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness; and synchronizing, by executing an instruction with the processor, a display of a respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with a display of a first portion of the first rendering and synchronizing a display of a respective second portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the aligned data, or the effectiveness with a display of a second portion of the first rendering.
 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the first sensory component of the media is a visual component and the second sensory component of the media is an auditory component.
 27. The method of claim 25, wherein the first cognitive delay is different from the second cognitive delay.
 28. The method of claim 25, wherein the audience member is a first audience member and the aligned data is first aligned data and further including time shifting one or more of third neuro-response data or fourth neuro-response data gathered from a second audience member exposed to the media to align the third neuro-response data and the fourth neuro-response data to form second aligned data, the third neuro-response data associated with the first sensory component and the fourth neuro-response data associated with the second sensory component.
 29. The method of claim 28, further including: performing a comparison of the first aligned data and the second aligned data; and determining the effectiveness of the media based on the comparison.
 30. The method of claim 25, wherein the aligned data is first aligned data and further including time shifting third neuro-response data gathered from the audience member to align the third neuro-response with fourth neuro-response data to form second aligned data, the third neuro-response data and the fourth neuro-response data simultaneously gathered from the audience member at a point in time subsequent to the gathering of the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data, the third neuro-response data associated with the first sensory component and the second neuro-response data associated with the second sensory component.
 31. The method of claim 30, further including aggregating the first aligned data and the second aligned data to form aggregated data.
 32. The method of claim 31, further including determining the effectiveness based on a trend in the aggregated data.
 33. A method comprising: synchronizing, by executing an instruction with a processor, media with at least one of first neuro-response data representing a first response to a visual component of media gathered from an audience member exposed to the media and second neuro-response data representing a second response to an auditory component of the media gathered from the audience member exposed to the media by offsetting at least one of the first neuro-response data and the second neuro-response data based on a first cognitive delay of a brain of the audience member and a second cognitive delay of the brain of the audience member, the first cognitive delay and the second cognitive delay being different; receiving a user request for a first study of a plurality of studies; analyzing, by executing an instruction with the processor, one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data to determine an analysis result for the first study; outputting, by executing an instruction with the processor, a first rendering of a plurality of renderings for display of the analysis result with the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data; synchronizing, by executing an instruction with the processor, a display of a respective first portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data with a display of a first portion of the first rendering and synchronizing a display of a respective second portion of the one or more of the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, or the synchronized neuro-response data with a display of a second portion of the first rendering; and storing, by executing an instruction with the processor, one or more of the media, the first neuro-response data, the second neuro-response data, the synchronized data, the analysis result, or the first rendering.
 34. The method of claim 33, further including synchronizing the media with the at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response data substantially continuously over a duration of the media.
 35. The method of claim 33, wherein the media includes a plurality of events and further including identifying an event in the media and synchronizing the event with the at least one of the first neuro-response data or the second neuro-response data.
 36. The method of claim 33, further including aggregating neuro-response data for a plurality of audience members exposed to the media.
 37. The method of claim 36, further including identifying a change in amplitude in the aggregated neuro-response data.
 38. The method of claim 37, wherein the change in amplitude is indicative of a change in an emotional state of an audience of the media.
 39. The method of claim 33, further including identifying the media as a success or a failure in invoking an emotional response in an audience of the media based on the change in amplitude. 